Decoding Legal Terms: What To Expect When Hiring A Collision Lawyer

Decoding Legal Terms: What To Expect When Hiring A Collision Lawyer – Review of Deciphering Jung’s Metaphysics: The Semantics of Archetypes in a Universe of Experience (Bernardo Kastrup) by David Simpson

I have been interested in the ideas and practices of Carl Jung for a long time, and over the past few years I have come to appreciate the teaching and writing of Bernardo Kastrup, so I was very happy when my son gave me this book this year. than . . So far, I’ve given away four books (which made writing this review a little easier!).

Decoding Legal Terms: What To Expect When Hiring A Collision Lawyer

Decoding Legal Terms: What To Expect When Hiring A Collision Lawyer

Born in Brazil, Bernardo Kastrup holds a doctorate in philosophy from Radboud University in the Netherlands. He began his professional career in computer technology, specializing in artificial intelligence, which is perhaps the reason for his interest in the nature of mind, consciousness, and the underlying nature of reality.

Inside Bill’s Brain: Decoding Bill Gates

A pleasure to read, it is written in clear, simple language, avoiding jargon and technical terms. This book made me feel like I improved my understanding of the subject, even though I don’t understand it completely.

Although I have long been interested in Jung, I have always struggled with his ideas—always felt that he was holding things back, or not articulating his ideas well. Kastrup opened the door, at least for me.

The book is titled, ‘Deciphering Jung’s Metaphysics’; While physics explains the terms and laws that govern physical things, metaphysics tries to look behind the curtain at the inner nature of reality. Metaphysics considers why something exists and includes ideas about the universe, gods, and other things. And all materialism can reject all metaphysics, although in fact theirs is clear – that is. and without metaphysics.

Kastrup and Jung had a positive view of metaphysics. Idealism as a philosophy is the idea that consciousness is fundamental and that it actually creates the physical world around us.

Phonics (encoding And Decoding) (video)

David Bohm and others have suggested that there is a unified field that reflects what we perceive as physical reality (space-time and its contents). We, as sentient beings, are but a ripple in the hidden field that experiences itself. If “I” can go once, “I” will see that I am everything, and everything is me.

It is clear that this concept has much in common with religious worldviews, especially with Eastern philosophies such as Advaita Hinduism, Buddhism and Daoism, as well as mystical Christianity. Jung, Pauli, Kastrup and others argue that it gives a better understanding of experience and reality than materialism, and not because idealism interferes with making, for ourselves, the experience of experience in the way of materialism does not exist. Materialism insists that consciousness is only a manifestation of complex organic life and that every sentient being is single and separate.

Jung recognizes that the materialism of science, from Bacon and Descartes to Dawkins today, is the right answer to the overly spiritual worldview of the past, but he believes that he himself will eventually pass. Both central and scientific positions are very limited.

Decoding Legal Terms: What To Expect When Hiring A Collision Lawyer

However, although Kastrup is an unabashed metaphysician, it seems that Jung himself may be more abstract, or at least. Jung felt that he should be taken seriously as an experimental and serious scientist and not called a maniac. As a result, he avoided until the last decade of his life to specifically explain his basic metaphysical ideas. Therefore, although he will refer to phenomena such as synchronicity, which often seem to indicate that he invented the unconscious, he hesitates to provide a theoretical basis for these. In fact, in the 1950s, when Jung corresponded with the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Wolfgang Pauli, Kastrup showed how he was a scientist who made the psychologist more important. It is unfortunate because if Jung had discussed his ideas and allowed him to make constructive criticism, he would have developed his ideas better.

Gpu Accelerated Video Processing With Nvidia In Depth Support For Vulkan Video

This is why some call it ‘decoding’ Jung’s ideas. In this book, I found Kastrup helpful in clarifying Jung’s key ideas about the ‘unconscious’ and the inner nature of reality. For Jung, we are called “unconscious” not because we know nothing, but because we do not know it. This affects both our personal and collective unconscious.

Jung believed that the only way the “unconscious” can communicate with us is through dreams and by influencing events in the outside world – which he called synchronicity. This certainly presents a significant challenge to the materialist view of reality – that the universe is simply a creation that, mysteriously and unexpectedly, consciousness occurs in humans and other complex life forms.’

Importantly, although some saw him that way, Jung did not “think” God. That is, he did not consider the concept of God as a product of individual or collective psychology. When asked if he believes in God, he says no, he “doesn’t believe” in God, he knows that God exists – although again, Kastrup suggests that he tends to talk about theology to avoid accusations of being unscientific. Kastrup quotes the funny, funny Don Cupitt of the BBC TV series Sea of ​​​​​​Faith, who says that “all religious truth is spiritual”, so that’s what I, Don Cupitt think, that’s how I read what Jung said . Which, in a way, served Jung’s purpose well, but left me as frustrated with Sea of ​​​​​​Faith as I was with Jung himself. However, according to Kastrup, Jung believed that what lies beneath our everyday ego is not the same, but rather a connection to the greater self, the basis of all things and non-humans.

For Jung, each individual and collective “unconscious” is the source and repository of what he calls archetypes, symbols, and hidden forces (and demons/demons) that have fascinated him throughout his life and experience, listed in the Red Book . He saw symbolism, mythology, alchemy, and tools of religious orders (such as the mandalas of Hinduism and Buddhist practice) as tools to explore, question, and communicate with the unconscious. The unconscious has psychoid elements (other people, archetypes, even demons) that have their own desires and agendas, and that communicate with us through dreams, but also from outside reality, hence his interest and what he calls synchronicity – his belief that they are obvious. . The coincidences, premonitions, and patterns we sometimes experience are actually ways of not knowing anything, either ourselves or our group (family, friends, country, culture, people, planet, and cosmos) ), both of which attract attention we are used to. , and try to deceive us or tell us about the hidden depths around us.

Asean Green Taxonomy: Decoding Sustainability In Southeast Asia

All of this got me thinking about Jesus and his relationship with the Sea of ​​Galilee (a hidden, unknown and ultimately great unknown symbol). He became a man in a day by walking on its banks, he baptized him (the Sea is the source of the Jordan), he crawled into its depths, gathered his treasures (he knew where Simon would throw his net), walk past. it. arise, and when his storm threatens to overtake us, he calms both him and us, and asks why we have no faith. He also takes it from one place to another, takes it from the disciples to the crowd (active work that exists every day in the dualistic world), the water to eat (back to himself) the poor demons have the gadarene pigs , and when, just give it a thought. , a few meters from the shore, and the world is not second, but it can still teach the crowd. Much of his public life revolved around him. Jerusalem, where he was killed, is of this world and far from his history. In Mark, on Sunday at the empty tomb, the young man said “he is not here . . . he has taken us to Galilee.”

Whether we choose to embrace materialism or the idea of ​​having a positive attitude is ultimately probably a matter of taste. Personally, I choose the one that includes everything, including everything that we do not know and may not know, and leaves out almost everything that makes life precious – that is, our personal consciousness and experience. I am very grateful to Kastrup for providing a satisfying, accessible and compelling account of Jung’s thought.

Bernardo Kastrup is the CEO of the Essentia Foundation. His work led to the modern revolution in metaphysical thought, the idea that reality is actually a thought. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy (ontology, philosophy of mind) and a Ph.D. and computer engineering (computer programming, artificial intelligence).

Decoding Legal Terms: What To Expect When Hiring A Collision Lawyer

As a scientist, Bernardo worked for the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and the Philips research laboratory (where the ‘Casimir Effect’ in quantum field theory was discovered). Well documented in numerous books and academic papers, his views have been featured in Scientific American, Institute of Art.

What To Look For In A Video Encoder And Decoder Pairing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

Boston’s Legal Elite: The Role Of A Car Accident Lawyer

Next Post

Automated Brilliance Unveiled: Essential Tools For Bug Bounty Success